The IQ Test : Lite Edition for Pc

This app helps you become more familiar with the app thinking patterns used to answer most IQ questions on official tests. It serves as a great aid in improving your puzzle solving skills. I am not sure if the app scoring system is accurate or not, because I scored an unusually high score of 152. I've realized the app timer is irrelevant in your final score because I answered 38/50 questions correctly and so did my friend. the app thing is, both of us took completely different time periods to finish the app test yet scored the app same score of 152. Clearly, time is not a factor that contributes to your final score meaning the app timer is pointless. This also led to the app conclusion that for each question you get correct, 4 points is added to your final score. Think about it- I got 38 questions correct and 38 x 4=152. IQ tests are based off how intelligent you are compared to everyone else. A score of 152 would make me 1 in 2,000 according to random sources on google. I do not believe I am that intelligent. If this test were accurate, then the app mean of most test takers should be 100. Based off of my leaderboard position, the app score of 152 set me in the app 11th percentile. the app significance of that means I scored higher than 89% of other users, meaning 11% scored higher than me. If that's case, I do not fit the app "genius" definition as only the app top .3% of the app population are geniuses. This would set my legitamate score as ~119. the app scores are definitely inflated- and that is a issue.

Many of the app people using this don't seem to understand how these questions are constructed and a number of them are lying. "I have an I.Q. of 133 and this app is so up and down, first it says I score 32 and then I score 288" <=*Your score in this doesn't go above 200 I max answered the app questions, also that massive up and down inconsistency is you guessing if that was an exaggeration. You expect me to believe you, you have a score of 133 (that is near the app 2% population of people) and you scored 32 in this app full of standard questions? Quit while your ahead. "This app is DUMB..." <= obviously you cant be with that beautiful opening. Use this app for practice not to prove how smart you are and complain when you find out that you have troubles with it. Do Putnam problems by hand, study up on literary devices, read a book that isn't teenage angst. If you truly want to grow you simply need to learn, an ability everyone has rather than getting frustrated and quitting. ~(Source) I just scored 146 on a standard test and applying for MENSA now. This helped me study because questions are a pain to collect being as scattered as they are. Also I find a nuisance of immature LOFT people that complain about things they can do, claiming they can't, when they don't try whatsoever.

Whoever wrote these questions didn't run them by enough people. In the app first 50 questions, I found a few that have multiple valid answers. For instance, one such question was "Sun : Planet :: Earth : ?" and both Moon and Satellite were options. Now, the app moon is a satellite technically, and so the app precision of language is off. It's a little annoying to have to assume that the app test is made for people who don't know the app actual definition of "satellite." Another one was "99 : 98 :: 198 : ?" and both 197 and 196 were listed. the app test maker says it's the app obvious answer (197), not recognizing that 198 is just twice 99 and 196 is twice 98, so 196 is the app answer if you're thinking in terms of proportions (as opposed to the app simple linguistic connection of "minus 1"). What I mean is proportionally/multiplicatively, 99:98=198:196. With at least two such questions out of just the app first 50, it's obvious to me that the app test makers didn't vet their questions. And anyway the app questions generally seem to be too easy, at least the app first 50.

the app overall concept and layout of breaking intelligence out into cleanly, identifiable sectors is brilliant. With that being said, grammar and context conveyed in the app Visualization test (a purchasable add-on) is sloppy and careless. Define the app variation between mirror imaging and water imaging to the app user. It appears that questions were worded by someone having knowledge of English as a second language and may have missed (or neglected to add) certain nuances. Programming and ease of use is fluid...not bad. Most importantly, at the app end of the app test, I'm not connected to rankings or any other meaningful analytics. People don't want to pay to take a test and hear they got a certain percentage correct without seeing the app relationship between that and a metric that ranks them against their peers. Don't lost sight of the app app's proposition offering as a whole.